Monday, October 15, 2012

The Fallacy of The Fantasy Fallacy

Well, it's no secret that this whole Christian-women-reading-Fifty Shades of Grey- thing gets me all fired up.  I just cannot understand why discretion seems to have gone out of style lately.  So when I saw that Shannon Ethridge, author of the bestselling "Every Woman's Marriage" series, was writing a book addressing the topic of sexual fantasy and thoughts, I was kind of excited.  Yes!  Someone needs to write about this!  Someone needs to point Christian women in the right direction, the direction of godliness and holiness and purity.  I thought this would be the perfect book for me to review for you all and tell you to go buy.
www.shannonethridge.com

Unfortunately, this is quite possibly the worst book I have ever read.  

It got me so worked up that I could only read it in small doses, I had to bribe myself with promises of better books to finish it, and one person I vented to about it jokingly offered to bring over some Xanax to calm me down. 

First of all, here's what the book is about: it's meant to be an analysis of why we have different types of sexual fantasies, whether or not they are sinful and what we should do with them.  Clearly relevant to Fifty Shades of Grey, right?

So why am I all worked up about it? Goodness, I don't even know where to start.  I could write a week's worth of posts on why this book was terrible, but I think I can pretty much boil it down to one major point.

It's unbiblical.  

I would expect a Christian author - particularly one who expresses much gratitude to God for bringing her out of a place of sexual addiction - to center her writing and her counsel around Scripture.  However, psychology takes the main stage while Scripture and Scriptural principles find their place in the periphery of Ms Ethridge's theories.  While I think that psychology has some interesting information to offer us, I absolutely do not believe that, for a believer, it should take precedence over Scripture.  And it definitely takes precedence over Scripture in this book.  Mrs Ethridge conveys a belief that Scripture does not have a whole lot to say on the topic of sexual fantasy, and that instead, we must all resort to Carl Jung for answers.  

Because Scripture takes such a back seat, much of the ensuing counsel is off track.  Let me offer you a little compare/contrast here.  

The reasons for sexual fantasy apparently boils down to deep-rooted wounds that our brains are simply trying to heal.  The only way to discover these wounds is to dive deep down examining the darkness of our soul - our "shadow self" - and to choose to experience any pain we might find in order to heal.  All of that sounds more like something Oprah would endorse.   

To discover why we are aroused by certain sexual fantasies, Ethridge writes,
We must allow ourselves to descend into the dark places, the hard places, that we (ourselves and the church) have tried diligently to avoid in the past...whatever feelings arise, green them, regardless of how scary or painful.  Pick each emotion up like a crying child.  Hold it.  Attend to it.  Comfort it.  Befriend your shadow self rather than reject it.  With this level of personal honesty, you may be able to bring into consciousness what your unconscious has been trying to say to you all along through your thoughts and dreams. (p.53, 55)
In contrast, how does Scripture tell us to direct our search to understand the why behind our thoughts, desires and actions? Understanding the why may be important, but when you examine these things apart from Christ, you miss out on truth from your Creator. We are to ask God to search our hearts.
Search me, O God, and know my heart!
Try me and know my thoughts!
And see if there be any grievous way in me,
and lead me in the way everlasting! (Psalm 139:23-24)
Is Ethridge really that sure that our "consciousness" is trustworthy?  Although believers do have the Holy Spirit living inside us, the reality is that we can be easily deceived by sin.  About this, Ed Bulkley, in his book Why Christians Can't Trust Psychology,  writes, "Self observation can lead to self-deception unless done under the intense spotlight of the Scripture." (p.155)

It's very unclear to me whether Ethridge believes that sexual fantasy is a sin issue or a heart issue.  There isn't a clear answer as to whether or not sexual fantasies are really sin.  Of course, when the reason for sexual fantasies boils down to your brain healing from childhood wounds, there really isn't any room for sin.  We now have an excuse for sexual fantasies.  I believe there are some very good reasons - found in Scripture - to think that sexual fantasies can be sin.  For instance, in Matthew 5, Jesus equates lustful thinking with adultery which would seem to indicate to me that behaviors AND thoughts can qualify as sinful.  Not only doesn't she really address lust (other than for a few paragraphs in chapter 1) but nowhere is there a solid discussion of our call to be pure (Titus 2:4).  

My side issue with her explanation for sexual fantasies and the behavior that proceeds because of them is that many of them are straight-up bizarreHere are two examples:

1) In explaining one of her theories for why Christians would be aroused by an orgy, she writes, 
 I truly believe that underneath every sexual desire is an even deeper spiritual desire, and when I think of what heaven will be like, I envision complete unity, harmony and love unlike anything we have experienced here on earth among fallen creatures.  Aren't these the very feelings that we are trying to create in our minds when we envision an orgy? (Granted it's infused with the twisted sexual distortions that have been passed down to us since Genesis.) A group of people with similar goals, desires, passions, all uniting in harmony to bring great intensity and delight to one another, could possibly be someone's (sexual) way of envisioning what heaven really will be like. (p.113-114)
2) While analyzing the why behind a young woman's strategy for soiling herself in a diaper to achieve orgasm (seriously, anyone who found Mark Driscoll's book "vulgar"?  You have no idea.):
Obviously, the only warmth Laura experienced as a young child was when she wet or soiled her own diapers.  To a baby who receives ample amounts of physical affection, the sensation of a dirty diaper can be rather disturbing.  But to a baby who is never touched, the sensation of a wet or dirty diaper may be a welcome reprieve from the monotonous isolation he or she constantly feels.  It's not difficult to imagine how this sensation would naturally evolve with a human being. (p.175)
Ethridge's main solution for what we are to do with sexual fantasies once we have determined their origin in our painful childhoods primarily consists of adjusting our behavior.  When she explains how we are "in complete control" (p.41) of the direction of the fantasy storyline, she simply offers six bullet points of ways to distract your mind, such as turning on music or focusing on your breathing (p.41-42).  While this may be practical, it's inadequate.  It is never enough to simply change behavior or to change our circumstances; we must allow God to get at our hearts!  What does the Bible tell us to do with our thoughts and desires?  It tells us to exercise self-control and to bring both our bodies and our minds into alignment with the mind of Christ.
Do you not know that in a race all the runners run, but only one receives the prize? So run that you may obtain it. Every athlete exercises self-control in all things. They do it to receive a perishable wreath, but we an imperishable. So I do not run aimlessly; I do not box as one beating the air. But I discipline my body and keep it under control, lest after preaching to others I myself should be disqualified.(1 Corinthians 9:24-27 ESV) 
We destroy arguments and every lofty opinion raised against the knowledge of God, and take every thought captive to obey Christ (2 Cor 10:5).
Elisabeth Elliot writes, "The Christian mortifies the flesh by submitting to the authority of Christ - to His authority in every area of his being, including his God-given but very dangerous sexuality.  It's dangerous as dynamite.  Fire and water, too, are gifts of God, but when they get out of control, the result is devastation." (Passion and Purity, p.96)

Well, I could go on and on, but it would just belabor the point.  I'm really disappointed that Ms Ethridge so completely missed a perfect opportunity to train the young women to love their husbands and children, to be self-controlled, [and] pure (Titus 2:4-5 ESV).  I wouldn't waste my time reading this book.  If you want to know what to do with sexual fantasies, I suggest you brew a cup of tea, find yourself a quiet spot and crack open the word of God.  The Creator of sex has answers even for that.

Sharing with: The Alabaster Jar, The Better Mom, Graceful, The Wellspring, NOBH, Monday's  Musings, Covered in Grace, Matrimonial Mondays, Time Warp Wife, Far Above Rubies, Growing Home,




23 comments:

  1. Oh my. I'm not sure if I should feel angry or just go and vomit. I knew Ethridge to be light on bible and heavy on psychology, but this is beyond anything I anticipated. I have noticed that authors who have been published in the past, and are popular, feel like it qualifies them to discuss EVERY issue. I really hope other see the danger of her terrible teaching.


    Very good review.

    ReplyDelete
  2. ok this lady is out of control, but why do ALL sexual fantasies have to be a sin? i mean if you are focusing on your spouse why is it a problem?

    ReplyDelete
  3. Thanks for sharing this very candid and eye-opening review of this woman's book. I was not aware of it until your post, and agree with you, Elizabeth, that she has not anchored it with God's Word. Very interesting and helpful, my friend!

    ReplyDelete
  4. I know just what you mean, Elizabeth, when you write that you got so worked up over this book. I feel that just reading your reactions. When something so vehemently flies in the face of truth, my blood boils. I feel that I could act out somehow to show my ire, or that I might spontaneously combust at the thought of someone, anyone writing or speaking so easily about something so difficult.


    Giving people human fixes will only intensify the mentality of "needing to know everyone's problems." Many people read books like these for the voyeuristic enjoyment, the what if and the how. Curiosity. Curiosity without good, helpful, right information will kill the cat.


    Raging with you!

    ReplyDelete
  5. I have considered covering sexual fantasies on my blog. I guess I'll move that topic up! I'm so surprised that this take from from Shannon Ethridge. Thanks for giving your perspective on this book.

    ReplyDelete
  6. I look forward to reading your take on sexual fantasy! Definitely move it up!

    ReplyDelete
  7. It was very frustrating to read...she does mention the Bible and God but it really, really comes across as peripheral.

    ReplyDelete
  8. "Many people read books like these for the voyeuristic enjoyment, the what if and the how." You're so right about that...and it was very gratuitous in many ways, like "why do we need to be discussing this in detail?" Many of the examples she used played right into that voyeurism you mentioned. I don't see how anyone could get direction on how to see sexual fantasy through God's eyes from this book.

    ReplyDelete
  9. I bought a book by Ethridge recently and I was VERY disappointed in it's pornographic content. What was more irritating was it was an eBook and Sony wouldn't even refund me my money. I definitely don't plan on reading anything more from her.




    lessonsfromivy.com

    ReplyDelete
  10. I'm sorry you feel you didn’t find what you were looking for in The Fantasy Fallacy. Our hope is that by helping readers understand exactly WHERE sexual thoughts and fantasies come from, they’ll be better equipped to ‘take every thought captive and make it obedient to Christ!’ Thanks for joining us in that prayer!

    ReplyDelete
  11. Was this presented as a biblical book? Some of what Shannon has done was intentionally cross over, and as such does not hit Scripture heavily. If she speaks truth, and can help marginal or non-Christians to avoid sexual sin, then I have no problem with the book. If it actually says things that are contrary to scripture, that's another thing all together.

    ReplyDelete
  12. Thanks for taking the time to read the review and comment, Shannon. We definitely agree on the need to take every thought captive but I just disagree that the primary root of sexual fantasy is unhealed pain from the past. I think there is a huge sin component that can be present, and we need to be focused on falling in love with Christ and renewing our minds with the truth of God's word in order to avoid falling into any kind of sexual sin.

    ReplyDelete
  13. Well, it's a Christian book, written by a Christian author and published by a Christian publisher so I would assume any counsel would be based in Scripture and therefore "biblical". I think there are some things that are contrary to Scripture, as I described in the review. Although I disagree with psychology figuring so prominently into her counsel, I think it could have been much better balanced with principles of purity, renewing our minds, falling in love with Christ, growing in our knowledge of God, etc.

    ReplyDelete
  14. If a writer is a Christian, and believes that the final authority for everything is Scripture and Christ, why would there be no evidence in that? If she is a medical doctor, counsellor, or sociologist, and it is an academic work, why would it be marketed to women as popular reading? There is no way to evaluate sinful thoughts apart from Scripture, so any analysis of that would include looking at Scripture.

    ReplyDelete
  15. I agree with you, Elizabeth. It is a huge generalization to say that everyone's sexual fantasies come from the same place. People are not robots, and sexual issues are much more complicated than that. As a lay person, even I know that. No author, no matter how informed, can tell someone where his or her sexual fantasies or issues come from. It takes a lot more personalized dialogue than in the pages of a book. Yes, take every captive to Christ; do it because the root of all sin no matter what, is self and the desire to please self and as D.A. Carson says, "de-god God."

    ReplyDelete
  16. "If she speaks truth." This is the crucial thing here. If she speaks truth as a Christian, then her truth is God's truth as revealed in Scripture. There is no neutrality as a Christian. If a Christian tries to operate with a presupposition that another kind of truth is acceptable, that Christian is suppressing the truth. If she speaks truth, God's truth, it does not have to be toned down or engineered to marginal Christians or not. God's truth does not need our help; it stands on its own and is powerful.

    ReplyDelete
  17. I think the answer to the primary root issue is an obvious one, and should point us to the primary source of help. We have more than one name for the root issue and more than one "type" of sin that stems from it, but the answer is: Satan. Whether we call him the Father of Lies, the Tempter, the Deceiver, the Accuser, we know that the basis of wrong-doing lies in him, and comes from him. Likewise, all answers come from the Bible, our source of help.
    When someone suffers sinful acts as a victim perpetrated by someone who has taken the path of destruction, the aftermath becomes a sad reality that must be fought. When a person has a painful past for any reason, he may act out in myriad ways, but allowing himself to dive into and study those ways carefully seems an invitation to invite more evil in ... maybe even roll out the red carpet for it. Satan doesn't lounge around waiting for an easy entrance -- we make them easy for him, and he leaps without a second thought. We have to be vigilant, we have to guard our hearts and minds, our every thought and action. When we have suffered, we have to redirect it with Divine assistance through prayer, helpful communication with a trusted godly representative.
    I believe that psychological assistance can help people, but it can also deceive them, confuse them, and lead them down too many paths with too many answers and possibilities. The Bible offers one solid "go to" with much to offer and many devoted Christian teachers, pastors and friends to help along the way.

    ReplyDelete
  18. I have not read this book, so my response is just based on what you have written above. I don't have a problem of there being a fusion of psychology and Scripture, because my point of view is that modern psychology is a study of mental function and behaviors. I do find value in what it holds because it can help unfold why we think how we think, even in light of how God made us and how the fall has cursed us. I think it can help us get down to practical steps of how to apply Scripture, like "taking every thought captive," and allowing our selves to have "self-control." This can be helpful when you do not even understand where your thoughts stem from. I don't think it's a bad thing to be "self aware" in the way you seem to describe she is describing it. I feel like sometimes people don't get to the root of the problem because they just try to slap a "Scripture Bandaid" on it and just think if i pray hard enough or read enough of the Truth, it will go away. But if there is a deeply rooted hurt that you have never recognized, I feel like the evil powers that be, can easily keep uncovering that since it is deeply rooted in us as humans. We are not perfect and we can't wish away traumas of the past. I think God can help us expose those and with his help and grace, move past it to be 'healed' from it. (i use that term in quotes because some things may always be a "thorn in our side" but God will help us through that)

    I understand that dangers in that, because like every gift God has given us, there is a way to abuse or pervert that, so I think you do need to offer it up to God to fully search and examine your heart and expose it to you. But I think the "help" with the pyschology you seem to be explaining from the book, is that it helps explain the brokenness of the world, which some of our sin (unhealthy sexual fantasies), may stem from.

    I think there can be a healthy balance of both.

    ReplyDelete
  19. Like I said in the review, I do think psychology can be helpful. One of my favorite marriage books - Love and Respect - uses many psychological and sociological studies that explain a lot of human behavior. Knowing the results of those studies has helped me understand Dave. Similarly, having read studies on introverts and what's going on in our brains has been helpful to explain myself. I don't think all psychology should be thrown out, not at all. My problem with this particular book is that it is SO heavy-handed in that direction and it completely lacks balance. She really conveys that she thinks Scripture is peripheral and that the PRIMARY reason for "deviant" sexual fantasies is unhealed childhood pain (as in the 2nd example of bizarre stuff...lady with the diaper). I think there's much more to it...we aren't just a brain or a body part misfunctioning; we are also spiritual beings. She could have used this platform to call us to purity or discernment for example, both of which are problems with this whole Fifty Shades of Grey hype among Christian women. There CAN be an aspect of sin in our thought life; I think our thoughts are equally as important as actions as in Jesus' example of the action of adultery being as sinful as lusting after a woman (in your head/heart).

    There are sometimes traumas of the past, yes, but I would say that most of us have dealt with sexual fantasies at one point or another and there isn't a *real* trauma that we need to search and search and search for as a root cause. Sometimes it's just plain old sin and sometimes it's our flesh and sometimes it probably is Satan. Her explanation is way too cut and dry in this book.

    ReplyDelete
  20. I'm not discussing the validity of sexual fantasy in this post. I'm critiquing a book that does a poor job of addressing the subject.

    ReplyDelete
  21. A pastor friend of mine shared with me once that he thinks that psychology is good for description of processes and identifying conditions, but modern psychology as a mindset is at odds with Scripture in how it proposes to help individuals. I would be curious to know what kind of credentials Ethridge has to make her conclusions, and what kind of samples she used to determine that everyone's sexual fantasies are related to childhood. Sounds rather Freudian.

    ReplyDelete
  22. I would agree with that...that's a great description. According to her website, she has a master's degree in counseling/human relations from Liberty University.

    ReplyDelete
  23. Well said! I had the same response to John Eldredge's "Wild at Heart" for the same reason: unbiblical, with not-so-subtle humanism throughout his book:

    http://www.gregdonner.org/thoughts/thoughts7.html

    ReplyDelete