Monday, June 25, 2012

Good Fences Make Good Marriages

As part of the Warrior Wife discussion surrounding Fifty Shades of Grey, one commenter brought up an interesting point, a point that I think is worth unpacking and discussing further.  


"I asked my husband if he would mind my reading this book. He of course asked me why I would ask him that question. I told him about what I have been reading in the blogging world of Christian women. He told me that if this book would be a threat to our marriage and sex life, then our marriage and sex life were probably not doing all that good in the first place. So no he did not care if I read the book. I agree with him totally. I mean if this book...could bring down a marriage, that marriage was not doing very well before the book came into the picture."


True? If a marriage and sex life can be negatively affected by one poorly written book, that marriage was bad to begin with?  


In a way, I agree.  One book, by itself, may not destroy a marriage and damage a healthy sex life.  I suppose that could be true.  But marriages are never destroyed in an instant; they are destroyed over a period of time by the buildup of many small things. 


Author Paul Tripp writes, "Marriages don't typically change with an explosion.  Marriages typically change by the process of erosion.  Even where marital explosions take place, they usually take place at the end of a long process of erosion...The problem is that as these changes are taking place we tend to be asleep at the wheel.  What we once committed to value and protect has progressively become the thing we take for granted." (What Did You Expect, p.254)  Introducing erotica (or porn or any other destructive behavior) is just a part of that eroding process.  


Every marriage that wants to thrive puts up boundaries to keep out unwanted intruders.  


Maybe your marriage is good, but why add temptation to the mix?  Think about it this way.  Assuming your marriage could never be damaged by erotica or porn is like buying a bottle of poison and then telling yourself that because you're healthy, tasting the poison will not adversely affect you.  That makes no sense!!  


Don't we try to keep safe the things we value?  We freak out about whether our kids are drinking organic milk or eating nitrate-free hotdogs or using paraben-free soap believing that a build-up of the possibly harmful ingredients could cause cancer.  Some parents choose not to vaccinate their child partly because they believe that the buildup of chemicals and viruses can damage a child's immune system.  Because of the possibility of harm, many of us choose to keep those products away from our children.  Why would we value our marriage any less?  


We need to be thinking carefully about even the little things.  Don't take your marital health for granted. One reader put it this way: "Sometimes the things that tempt us the most are things we don't expect and are not prepared for.  Playing around with a book like that is just asking for trouble...[Your] heart is not some magical solid door that just whisks off with ease the sin that entraps the rest of us women.  [You're] just as vulnerable.  And [you're] only hurting [yourself] by believing otherwise."


For each marriage, the things we choose to allow or disallow may be different.  Some things should be kept out across the board (porn, etc), but we each evaluate our marriage and keep out things that harm it.  For some, that may mean staying away from social media.  It might mean not even reading seemingly innocent Christian romance novels because you find yourself disliking your spouse for not measuring up to the perfection of the male protagonists.  It might mean avoiding certain friends because they are a negative influence.  Dave and I found that there was a certain couple several years ago that made us very dissatisfied with each other so we didn't cultivate a deep friendship with them.  (Interestingly enough, they are now divorced, partially because little and not-so-little sins were never confronted and dealt with.)


So, in the end...no, by itself, Fifty Shades of Grey may not destroy your marriage in one fell swoop.  But is it worth the possibility of allowing that book to begin a process of erosion?


Sharing with: The Better Mom, The Alabaster Jar, Time-Warp Wife, Far Above Rubies, Women Living Well, Deep Roots at Home, NOBH, Wifey Wednesday

13 comments:

  1. Good post, Elizabeth! It may not be the straw that breaks the camel's back, but it's the beginning of a bad habit. I was thinking that if a couple needed an outside source to inspire their intimate life, perhaps there are trust issues that need resolving.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Hi Elizabeth, I found your post over at The Better Mom! I love your message here - it is those seemingly small decisions that add up over time to become big ones. A lot of wisdom, and a great practical reminder for me today. Thanks!
    Blessings,
    Ann

    ReplyDelete
  3. I love the wisdom of this. There are so many "little things" besides even this topic that will erode a marriage. A deep intimate friendship with a person of opposite sex may be sincerely innocent but the relationship can slowly change almost imperceptively until the friend has replaced the spouse as confidant etc. Criticizing our spouse constantly or even critical thoughts can slowly steal respect etc. I'm glad to thing about this. Thanks!

    ReplyDelete
  4. Another great post! I recently heard something along the lines of your quote on poison. Most poison is slow acting, not immediate.
    My thing is (and I might blog about this) even if you take away the sexual part of the book (not that I think it is in anyway ok), he's a complete gentleman to her in public. Most husbands aren't that way, I know we have three kids to chase and opening my door is not as important as theirs to grab their hands before they head to the street :) Sometimes it's the subtle character traits that we begin to find endearing and then wonder why our husband isn't like that. It just begins more erosion ....

    ReplyDelete
  5. I wholeheartedly agree, Elizabeth! There are far too many people who do not live with intentionality, and one form of intentionality is "protecting what you value." This doesn't mean we have to be fearful of every little thing, but from what little I know about this book from what I've seen and heard on TV, it is definitely a threat to marriage. For some the threat may not be as dangerous, but for others who have sexual issues in their marriages or lives, I think it could be very harmful.

    ReplyDelete
  6. The logic of the commenter amazes me. I don't know if she is a Christian, but I am stunned at
    the lengths Christian women will go to justify playing with fire. Scripture is so clear about sin...RUN! Yes, let's call this book what it is. Sin. Let's take the logic and go a bit further. Surely if their marriage is strong, then this woman could have dinner with another man, go back to his hotel room, etc. etc. After all, these things would only have a negative effect IF their marriage was weak to begin with. Isn't this line of reasoning absolutely ridiculous...even to a pagan? How are we defining sin anyway? The children's catechism: Sin is any want of conformity unto or transgression of the law of God OR shall we re-define it as, "Anything is ok and only becomes sin if I see immediate damage to me or those around me. I will define for myself what sin is." The issue here isn't only how does it affect your marriage...the issue is is this pleasing to the LORD. Does this reflect that I know Him and belong to Him? Does engaging in this reading honor Him? I'm more grieved by how far away Christian women are from the WORD and the truth of the Word that they even struggle with whether or not they should read this.

    ReplyDelete
  7. I completely agree with you, Trisha. Even in two blog posts on this book, I wasn't able to cover the myriad of problems with this book. I have to say that I really am shocked at who is reading this book. And your point about being far away from the Word is spot on. If we were saturate with the truth, it wouldn't even be a debate. We would just be completely repelled by this book.

    ReplyDelete
  8. True....I've read comments on posts about this book on other blogs and a few women have expressed that their background with sexual abuse has caused them to fear this book. And I just really can't imagine how reading about someone else's sex life is really going to benefit anyone in the long or short term.

    ReplyDelete
  9. I think that issue of latching onto a character trait that we wish our husband had is often true in difficult marriages. For instance, I've read the Twilight books and thought the relationship was completely ridiculous and actually unhealthy so I never got into the romance of it, but I have friends who were just infatuated with Edward and thought it was so romantic...those were the people whose marriages were difficult and they were having trouble even liking their husband. Our husband doesn't even have a chance if he has to act like imaginary characters.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Absolutely! Thanks for hopping over here!

    ReplyDelete
  11. Great post, Elizabeth! We are to be as wise as serpents! Just because something is lawful does not make is spiritually profitable for us. We are to guard our hearts and in doing so, we need fences to protect us. Thanks for linking up with The Alabaster Jar.

    ReplyDelete
  12. I have always said that each marriage has its own dynamics, and only that husband and wife completely understand it, but the reality is if that "dynamic" does not include God at the center of it all, then it can become like chaff that just blows in the wind. The words you share here are so powerful, and they give much for all to think about. Thank you for sharing it on NOBH.
    Love and God Bless,
    Christy

    ReplyDelete
  13. I agree with this. Plus we have to remember that the majority of these books are written by women, not men. The way the male characters act and converse is rarely what I have seen from any man, let alone my husband. It is how women wish men acted (or at least how they think they would want them too).

    ReplyDelete